Xiyu Wang vs Dalma Galfi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the second serve performance over the last six months, both Galfi and Wang exhibit similar statistics, with Galfi winning 38.43% of points on her second serve and Wang achieving a slightly higher 38.6%. This statistic often plays a crucial role in match prediction accuracy, providing insights into their service reliability.

In return games, recent statistics reveal that Galfi has been marginally more successful, winning 50.71% of her opponents' second serve points, compared to Wang's 49.8%. The performance on first serve returns shows Galfi with a 30.11% success rate over Wang's 27.63%. Such return stats are instrumental in identifying the favorite in direct head-to-head confrontations.

Examining player pressure management, Galfi has successfully saved 48.82% of breakpoints in recent matches, whereas Wang has managed a lower 42.31% breakpoint save rate. This statistic is particularly valuable for those looking into in-game betting predictions.

Over the past year, Galfi has been more successful in securing matches, with a win rate of 57.63% (34 wins and 25 losses), while Wang holds a 43.9% win rate (18 wins and 23 losses). A comprehensive head-to-head assessment indicates that Galfi might have the upper hand based on recent records.

Considering their best performance on different surfaces, Galfi excels on grass with a 64% win rate, whereas her weakest surface is indoor hard courts at 46%. In contrast, Wang's best surface is clay with a 62% win rate, and her least effective surface is indoor hard courts, where she has a 40% win rate. Such surface preferences can significantly impact the potential outcome of matches.

When reviewing their participation levels last year, Galfi has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 58.33% of her matches. Meanwhile, Wang has competed more frequently on the Main tour, achieving a 50% win rate. It's essential to consider the relative level of events each player has participated in when comparing their statistics.

In their direct head-to-head encounters, Wang holds a slight advantage, winning two out of three matches against Galfi. The most recent confrontation at the Thailand Open saw Galfi emerging victorious in a tightly contested match. Historically, their matches average a duration of 1:49:27.

In deciding sets, both players have shown potential with Galfi winning 53% of such sets in the past 12 months, while Wang has achieved 30%. If the upcoming match extends to a deciding set, Galfi’s previous success could indicate a potential edge.

Assessing the quality of their opponents, over the last year, Galfi has faced players with an average rank of 203.98, compared to Wang's more challenging opposition averaging a rank of 111.54. This disparity might influence how they approach each other's playing styles.

In terms of breaking opportunities, both players are nearly identical, with Galfi converting 33.92% of breakpoints and Wang at 33.9%. This close comparison reflects their competitiveness in pressurized scenarios.

While historical data favors Galfi in several statistical areas, it is also crucial to consider event-specific and current form data once the tournament commences. Factoring in all these elements, Galfi appears slightly more dominant and is thus predicted as the likely victor in their upcoming encounter.